Entrepreneurship Learning Innovation in Vocational High Schools: A Case Study

Authors

  • Mahmmudin, M.M universitas muhammadiyah sampit Author
    • Supervision
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    • Visualization
    • Validation
    • Software
    • Resources
    • Project Administration
  • Dr. Sayhrul Amin Author
    • Conceptualization
    • Methodology
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.0001/f2mekv66

Keywords:

Entrepreneurship Learning Vocational High School Innovation Curriculum Case Study

Abstract

This study investigates the innovation in entrepreneurship education at a vocational high school in Indonesia, focusing on the pedagogical strategies, teacher-student interactions, and learning outcomes within the context of a curriculum change. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal a significant gap between the curriculum's goals and its implementation. The learning process relies heavily on conventional, teacher-centered methods such as dictation and lecturing, which do not align with the creative and dynamic nature of entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the study identifies critical psychological and behavioral barriers, including students' shyness and fear of asking questions, which hinder active participation. Despite adequate physical facilities, the lack of varied learning resources and a supportive psychological environment prevents effective learning. This research concludes that the success of entrepreneurship education is not solely dependent on a robust curriculum or infrastructure but requires a fundamental shift towards a student-centered pedagogical approach. The study provides actionable insights for educators and policymakers on the necessity of overcoming both pedagogical and psychological obstacles to foster a sustainable and innovative learning culture in vocational education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu, J. K. (2024). Empowering Vulnerable Populations and Fostering Entrepreneurship through Financial Literacy: A Case Study of Economic Benefits in the U.S. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(12), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i121604

Avinta Ika Nurrahma, Saifuddin, & Siti Nafi’yah. (2023). Using Simulation as Project-Based Learning to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill on Business English Course. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 2(3), 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i3.209

Belitski, M., Guenther, C., Kritikos, A. S., & Thurik, R. (2022). Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00544-y

Cheah, L. A., & Apostolatos, A. (2024). Exploring the Synergy of Simulation and Hardware in Project-Based Learning. 2024 IEEE 3rd German Education Conference (GECon), 1–6. 2024 IEEE 3rd German Education Conference (GECon). https://doi.org/10.1109/GECon62014.2024.10734023

Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Salman, M. (2019). The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15028–15038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y

Dias, M. F., Alves, C., & Amorim, M. (2024). Board Games and Entrepreneurial Skills Acquisition: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Efficacy of the EntreComp Framework in Higher Education. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 18(1), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.18.1.2666

Hammond, T. C., Alexander, C., Brown, K., Miller, W., & Weinburgh, M. (2024). That Thing in Your Pocket: Cultivating a Geo-Sustainable Mindset in High School Chemistry Students Using GIS to Study Smartphone Components. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7007

Hoxmeier, J. A. (2002). Experiential Learning within Computer Information Systems Courses (G. Harindranath, W. G. Wojtkowski, J. Zupančič, D. Rosenberg, W. Wojtkowski, S. Wrycza, & J. A. A. Sillince, Eds.; pp. 611–618). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0595-2_49

Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2002). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274

Kaiyanan, C., Atthakorn, S., Ludpa, Y., Seti, S., Lavong, A., Pliankham, P., & Phoorisophon, T. (2024). Integrating Entrepreneurship into Education: Cultivating Skills for Innovation, Leadership, and Future Workforce Success. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 1(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.795

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4

Li, Y. (2023). A Study on the Classroom Engagement of Visually Impaired Students Based on the CIPP Evaluation Model: A Case Study of College English Classes in an Inclusive Education Context. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(28). https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.062808

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Manseur, Dr. R. (2024). Cultivating the Entrepreneurial Mindset: Integrating Theory and Practice in Curricula across University Departments. Journal of Production, Operations Management and Economics, 46, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.46.24.34

Matović, N., & Ovesni, K. (2023). Interaction of quantitative and qualitative methodology in mixed methods research: Integration and/or combination. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1964857

Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254

Powa, J. E., Widdah, M. E., & Pendi, H. Z. (2023). Analysis Of Islamic Education Policy in The National Education System Law No. 20 Year 2003. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogic Studies (JCPS), 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30631/jcps.v2i1.1777

Purzer, Ş., Fila, N. D., & Nataraja, K. (2016). Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education. Advances in Engineering Education. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluation-of-Current-Assessment-Methods-in-Purzer-Fila/150f04e451aac61f655f53d5747061e6bef24b93

Thompson Burdine, J., Thorne, S., & Sandhu, G. (2021). Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 55(3), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14380

Wang, Y. (2019). Study on the Strategies of the Integration of Ideological and Political Education and Innovative Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities. 218–220. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccesd-19.2019.54

Wimalasooriya, C., & Wickramaarachchi, D. (2025). Co-Creating Industry-Ready Software Engineering Graduates: Bridging the Academia-Industry Gap through Agile and Prosumer-Based Learning. 2025 International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE), 1–6. 2025 International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSE65633.2025.11031

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

Issue

Section

Case Study

How to Cite

Entrepreneurship Learning Innovation in Vocational High Schools: A Case Study. (2025). Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.0001/f2mekv66

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.