Comparative Study on Learning Innovation and Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies: A Collaborative Research between Indonesia and Brazil

Authors

  • Dr. PatriciaVargas Author
    • Conceptualization
    • Methodology
    • Data Curation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Endang Sri Estimurti, M.Pd Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya image/svg+xml Author
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.0001/2aq11v57

Keywords:

learning innovation,, evidence-based teaching, comparative study, Indonesia, Brazil

Abstract

This study compares the implementation of evidence-based learning innovations in senior high schools in Indonesia and Brazil, using the Merdeka Curriculum and the Basic National Common Curriculum (BNCC). The background of this study stems from the similarities in the two countries' challenges, such as gaps in teacher quality, unequal access to technology, and the need to adapt strategies to local contexts. This study used a qualitative comparative case study design in six high schools (three in Indonesia and three in Brazil) selected through purposive sampling, involving 12 teachers with at least three years of experience. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and analysis of learning documents. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach and cross-case analysis with triangulation of sources, researchers, and member checking to maintain validity. The results indicate that active learning and formative assessment are core strategies in both countries. Indonesia relies on formal Learning Management Systems such as Google Classroom and Kahoot, while Brazil utilizes WhatsApp, flipped classrooms, and peer teaching. Supporting factors in Indonesia include Subject Teacher Conference training and local government support, while in Brazil it comes from teacher communities and educational NGOs. Barriers in Indonesia include the digital literacy gap, while in Brazil limited devices and internet connectivity. The TPACK analysis shows that technology integration in Indonesia is more structured, while in Brazil it is more adaptive. Based on SAMR, innovation in Indonesia is at the Augmentation to Modification level, while Brazil has reached Modification to Redefinition. These findings emphasize the importance of local adaptation in implementing evidence-based strategies and recommend cross-border training and the exchange of good practices to strengthen educational innovation in developing countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aidarbekova, K. A., Abildina, S. K., Odintsova, S. A., Mukhametzhanova, A. O., & Toibazarova, N. A. (2021). Preparing future teachers to use digital educational resources in primary school. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5653

Amalia, R., Sativa, O., Drazat, Z., & Maswani, M. (2025). Transformasi Pendekatan Guru Bahasa Arab MTsN 35 Jakarta dalam Menghadapi Kompleksitas Kurikulum Merdeka. Ta’limi | Journal of Arabic Education and Arabic Studies, 4(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.53038/tlmi.v4i2.350

Andrew, N. R., Clarke, C., & Mackay, L. (2010). Introducing a Scenario-Based, Modularized Architecture for Learning Entomology. American Entomologist, 56(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/56.1.6

Davies, J., & Donnelly, M. (2024a). Spatial division of opportunity: Local economic context, elite trajectories, and the widening participation industry. Social & Cultural Geography, 25(6), 852–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2023.2203119

Davies, J., & Donnelly, M. (2024b). Spatial division of opportunity: Local economic context, elite trajectories, and the widening participation industry. Social & Cultural Geography, 25(6), 852–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2023.2203119

DeLiema, D., Hufnagle, A., Rao, V. N. V., Baker, J., Valerie, J., & Kim, J. (2023). Methodological innovations at the intersection of video-based educational research traditions: Reflections on relevance, data selection, and phenomena of interest. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.2011196

Gupta, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2022). Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: A systematic literature review and thematic analysis. Journal of Asset Management, 23(3), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-022-00255-3

Han, X., & Huang, X. (2024). The Evolution of Cross-Cultural Rhetoric: An Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies in the Context of Globalization. Journal of Higher Education Research, 5(5), 401. https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v5i5.3038

Haq, H., & Wakidi. (2024). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Secondary Schools in the Digital Era. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i4.391

Hartono, H., Nuryani, W., & Kusumastuti, E. (2024). Javanese art conservation in Indonesia inheriting potentials of local wisdom through Wayang Wong Bocah. Research in Dance Education, 25(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2022.2062317

Hashizume, C. M. (2021). MEC-Brasil, decreto 10.502. Política nacional de educação especial: Equitativa, inclusiva e com aprendizado ao longo da vida, de 30 de setembro de 2020. Brasília: MEC, 2020. EccoS – Revista Científica, 56, e18627. https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n56.18627

Howell, D., Oliver, T. K., Keller-Olaman, S., Davidson, J., Garland, S., Samuels, C., Savard, J., Harris, C., Aubin, M., Olson, K., Sussman, J., MacFarlane, J., & Taylor, C. (2013). A Pan-Canadian practice guideline: Prevention, screening, assessment, and treatment of sleep disturbances in adults with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(10), 2695–2706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1823-6

Jain, N. (2025). AI as a Catalyst for Educational Equity: Addressing Global Teacher Shortages and Learning Disparities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT25111200

Krupko, S., & Ternopilska, V. (2024). Use of Educational Digitalization Resources in The Process of Developing the Social Mobility of Future Social Work Specialists. Problems of Education, 1(100), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3986.1-100.2024.11

Lamar, M. F., Wilhelm, J. A., & Cole, M. (2018). A mixed methods comparison of teachers’ lunar modeling lesson implementation and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220356

Ma, S. (2024). Analysis of the Gap Between Urban and Rural Education in China from the Perspective of Educational Equity. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 70, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/70/20241083

Mavi, D., Ayyıldız, P., & Özdemir, M. (2022). Knowledge Production in The Field of Educational Administration in Turkey: Evaluation of Dissertations within The Context of Habermas’ Knowledge Taxonomy. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(2), 283–318. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.919630

Moi, R. M., & Hamdalah, A. (2025). Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Zakat and Sadaqah: Strategies for Socio-Economic Empowerment in Predominantly Non-Muslim Superpower Nations. Asian Journal of Muslim Philanthropy and Citizen Engagement, 1(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.63919/ajmpce.v1i2.31

OECD. (2022). PISA Results 2022 (Volume III)—Factsheets: Indonesia | OECD. PISA Results 2022 (Volume III) - Factsheets: Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1-en/indonesia_a7090b49-en.html

Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2024). An Audience Facilitates Facial Feedback: A Social-Context Hypothesis Reconciling Original Study and Nonreplication. Psychological Reports, 127(6), 3170–3189. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231153975

Qu, L., & Li, L. (2024). Implementation Strategy of Project-Based Learning in Mobile Learning Environments and Its Effects. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(22), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i22.52449

Rodriguez, L. A., Nguyen, T. D., & Springer, M. G. (2025). Revisiting Teaching Quality Gaps: Urbanicity and Disparities in Access to High-Quality Teachers Across Tennessee. Urban Education, 60(2), 467–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231153409

Simons, H. (1996). The Paradox of Case Study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764960260206

Snoeck, D., Schröfl, C., & Mechtcherine, V. (2018). Recommendation of RILEM TC 260-RSC: Testing sorption by superabsorbent polymers (SAP) prior to implementation in cement-based materials. Materials and Structures, 51(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1242-8

Tabroni, I., & Karlina, N. (2022). Strategy For Improving The Quality Of Education At Sdn Sukamukti, Subang. L’Geneus : The Journal Language Generations of Intellectual Society, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.35335/geneus.v11i1.2178

Thieman, G. Y., & Cevallos, T. (2017). Promoting educational opportunity and achievement through 1:1 iPads. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(5), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2017-0047

Turner, B. (2007). Economic, Social, and Cultural Contexts for Market and Product Diversification of the Lithuanian Tourism Sector. Transition Studies Review, 14(3), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-007-0155-y

Tuwoso, Putra, A. B. N. R., Mukhadis, A., Mahamad, A. K. B., & Sembiring, A. I. (2020). Development of MOOCs synchronized life-based learning to improve the quality of outcomes in prospective vocational teachers in the era of education 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456(1), 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012051

Warner, A. G. (2016). Developing a Community of Inquiry in a Face-to-Face Class: How an Online Learning Framework Can Enrich Traditional Classroom Practice. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916629515

Yanti, A. D., Andriani, T., Aryani, N., & Jamaludin, M. A. S. bin. (2024). the role of educators ın ımprovıng the qualıty of educatıon ın the era of technologıcal dısruptıon at tıara ıntegrated ıslamıc elementary school, pekanbaru. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v8i2.52655

Yupanqui, R. C. (2025). Community-Engaged Education Policies and Their Impact on Urban-Rural Educational Equity in Peru. Research and Advances in Education, 4(3), 1–9. https://www.paradigmpress.org/rae/article/view/1557

Zhou, S., & Liang, J. (2021). Migrant workers and environmental amenities and infrastructure in urban China: From the lens of environmental justice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1920379

Төлеужан, А. Т. (2022). Обзор использования аудиовизуальных средств в качестве открытых образовательных ресурсов в процессе обучения английскому языку среди учащихся средних школ. Bulletin of the Karaganda University Pedagogy Series, 108(4), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.31489/2022ped4/207-213

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

Comparative Study on Learning Innovation and Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies: A Collaborative Research between Indonesia and Brazil. (2025). Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.0001/2aq11v57

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.